Mandatory DUI Blood Tests Unconstitutional
DUI Blood Tests |
Many states, including Ohio, criminalize the refusal to
submit to alcohol testing after being arrested for DUI. The United States Supreme Court, in ruling
mandatory DUI blood tests unconstitutional, imposed severe limits on such state
laws.
In its 2016
decision, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld warrantless breathalyzer tests but
struck down warrantless blood tests for DUI investigations. The Supreme Court concluded that breath tests
are not very intrusive and that state have a compelling interest in preventing
drunk driving. Obtaining blood draws are
more intrusive, as they involve piercing the skin and extracting a part of the
subject’s body. Background
States used to just impose license suspensions for refusing
tests for measuring blood alcohol levels.
States began passing tougher DUI laws by increasing penalties for higher
blood alcohol levels. Faced with greater
criminal penalties, suspects had a lot of motivation to refuse a test measuring
blood alcohol if they felt it would result in high enough levels to require
such increased penalties. The states
responded by making refusal of alcohol tests a crime.
Impact on Ohio DUI law
Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test |
Ohio DUI laws make it a crime to refuse any testing for
alcohol or drugs if one is also guilty of DUI.
In other words, refusal of alcohol testing is not a crime in Ohio if one
is not operating a motor vehicle while impaired.
Due to the U.S. Supreme Court decision, Ohio’s law
criminalizing refusal to take blood tests is unconstitutional. If law enforcement wants a blood tests, they
will have to get a warrant. However, I
believe it is no longer a crime to refuse a blood test after being arrested for
OVI in Ohio. This does not mean that
some police officer, prosecutor and court will not try to enforce this invalid
law. It simply means that I believe, in
the end, one would prevail on this issue.
If you would like to read more about Ohio OVI laws, take a
look at my white
paper on Ohio OVI law.
Attorney Daniel Gigiano. Experienced. Aggressive. Dedicated.
Attorney Daniel Gigiano was admitted to the practice of law
in Illinois in 1993. He immediately
began practicing as an assistant prosecutor working in a courtroom that focused
on major traffic cases, such as DUI and driving under suspension, spending over
one year focusing on the many issues in these cases. Attorney Daniel Gigiano then spent the next
five years of his government practice working on misdemeanors, felonies, grand
jury and preliminary hearings, juvenile delinquency cases, and abuse and
neglect cases. In 1999, he was admitted
to practice in Ohio. In 2000, he took
his experience to a private practice in Wadsworth, Medina County, Ohio. Attorney Gigiano has maintained a practice in
Wadsworth since that time. Call now at
330-336-3330 if you need the services of an experienced Medina DUI attorney in
Wadsworth.
No comments:
Post a Comment